The UK’s energy and utilities sector keeps the country running. But, with a built estate that’s ageing and often in remote locations, buildings maintenance can be challenging. Taking a more strategic procurement approach could be a light-bulb moment
As the UK transitions to net zero, our power supply also needs to transition from reliance on fossil fuels to use of clean energy from renewable sources such as wind and solar. This shift is already underway, with almost 30% of the country’s energy coming from wind alone in the year to February 2024.
To ensure the switch to different power sources is as smooth as possible, energy companies need to reduce the risk of disruption to supply – and buildings maintenance has an important role to play in this.
Buildings maintenance within the energy and utilities sector is both critical and challenging, says Chris Cruise, Industry Sector Manager at RS. “If you’re the CEO of a power company you, clearly, need to ensure there is minimal disruption to supply from building maintenance,” he explains. “Utilities firms commonly have it written into their contracts that they will provide continuous service, with heavy fines if that is broken.
“You’re dealing with a huge variety of built estate, everything from remote pumping stations through to big brick buildings with loads of lighting and heating issues, external floodlighting, outdoor signage and so on. Or it can even be a head office in London or Birmingham or wherever. So, it is the full range.”
Remote locations cause logistical issues
Remote pumping stations will often be unmanned, creating issues around logistics and health and safety. “Even an urgent maintenance demand can end up going to a central location before then being redistributed out to the engineer, who then has to drive out to the site and deal with the issue,” says Cruise.
All this means taking a more considered and strategic approach to your buildings’ maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) procurement can pay dividends. When it comes to procurement, the constant focus is often, very understandably, on sourcing items at the lowest cost. But this can be a false economy for two reasons, argues Cruise.
First, while item cost is, of course, important, it’s equally valuable in the long run to be considering totex, or total expenditure; in other words, thinking about the whole-life cost of an asset – the maintenance cost over its lifetime – rather than simply its initial procurement outlay.
Soft costs mount up
Second, you need to consider soft or indirect procurement costs – the time and paperwork associated with constantly chasing around multiple suppliers for the lowest price – as well as the hard (or actual) cost of each item, he advises.
“With an order value of £100 you need to recognise there can be a hidden cost to that in terms of your own time. If you’re procuring 100 or 1,000 orders each worth £100, and having to check, process and pay for each order, that can really add up,” says Cruise. “The indirect procurement process costs can be twice as much as the products themselves.”