Cultural challenges
“One of the biggest barriers to a successful implementation of the IIoT can be trying to balance the competing needs of organisation technology (OT) and information technology (IT) within a business,” Jeffers explains. “Everyone concerned with engineering and manufacturing for a large business may be completely convinced of the needs to embrace the IIoT, but that still isn’t always enough.”
They may have very compelling arguments to put forward about the pressure to keep up with customer expectations and the dangers of being left behind by leaner, more efficient competitors. That still might not be enough, either.
The IT professionals within the business are charged with safeguarding the corporate network and all the things connected to it – everything from employee data to customer data, from an online sales front-end to back-end functions like accounting and finance. Quite reasonably, they may view the connection of thousands of smart sensors to their systems as the presence of thousands of potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Vetoing the adoption of the IIoT might not make a lot of operational sense, but it certainly avoids a problem no one wants.
Jeffers continues: “Bridging that gap so that any potential security issues are addressed without shutting an organisation off from the advantages of the IIoT is vitally important, therefore. It may call for a single set of KPIs and objectives for OT and IT teams, so that collaborating together on solutions becomes the norm.”
Effective collaboration
Many of the theories around the IIoT and Industry 4.0 have been discussed at length in research circles for decades, says maintenance engineering academic, Dr Moray Kidd: “For many of us, including the generation before me, we’ve been looking at these techniques for quite some time.
“It wouldn’t be unfair to say that not much of it is new in an academic context; some of these principles were proposed over 40 years ago.”
What was missing until recently, however, was the enabling technology. Now that the IIoT and Industry 4.0 are a reality, some of the old, familiar job demarcations we are used to seeing must be re-examined.
“I see some really exciting times ahead as we witness the formation of multidiscipline teams,” Dr Kidd says. “Historically, there are divisions between disciplines like mechanical engineering, maintenance engineering or research on one side and people working in computer science on the development of machine learning algorithms on the other.”
Multi-disciplinary teams can tackle a problem from many perspectives simultaneously to make smart decisions around the future of maintenance engineering, for example.
Dr Kidd continues: “A lot of the things we've discussed over the years in academia are now not far away from commercial application. Questions like ‘Why don't we have autonomous systems, self-healing systems?’ aren’t just being talked about – we’re seeing things come to fruition.”