Login / Register to access your benefits
Recently searched
    Getting a grip on MRO spend

    GETTING A GRIP ON MRO SPEND

    With MRO costs increasing, organisations are seeking to develop closer relationships with suppliers, so they can identify opportunities for efficiencies in their category management strategy and reduce the risk of counterfeit items entering the supply chain.

    Organisations are spending 20 per cent more on maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) than they were in the last 12 months, according to the 2025 Indirect Procurement Report , produced by RS and the Chartered Institute of Procurement Supply.

    Some of this may be down to price inflation but it’s also an indication that organisations are trying to get more out of existing machinery, rather than investing in new equipment, suggests Agata Evans, Senior Procurement Manager for MRO at Aston Martin. “MRO is becoming a priority for organisations and they are trying to be more proactive about repairing equipment now, so they can avoid more expensive problems of having to replace equipment later on,” she says.

    At the same time, the average number of suppliers organisations use is up by 18 per cent, from 75 in 2023 to 92 this year, and the proportion of businesses using more than 250 suppliers has increased from 6 to 15 per cent.

    While many organisations are looking to consolidate their supplier base – half of those surveyed say this is a priority – it may also reflect the realities of working in the current turbulent environment. “Over the last few years, we’ve been in multiple crises mode, and the number of businesses going into administration has had a huge impact on supply chains,” says Jane Lynch, Professor of Procurement at Cardiff Business School and Director of the Centre of Public Value Procurement. “Having more than one supplier is about mitigating risk and ensuring security of supply.”

    “One of the textbook characteristics of procurement maturity is optimising the number of suppliers to ensure greater value.”

    Jane Lynch, Professor of Procurement at Cardiff Business School and Director of the Centre of Public Value Procurement

    This may even lead to a change in how organisations view the balance between economies of scale and the number of suppliers, she suggests. “One of the textbook characteristics of procurement maturity is optimising the number of suppliers to ensure greater value,” she says. “But our view on what a mature procurement function looks like today may be very different to some of the textbook frameworks, models and typologies that we’ve been trained to use in years gone past.”

    Evans says that, despite the apparent contradiction, it makes sense for organisations to be both trying to consolidate their supplier base but also to expand it in certain categories to reduce risk. “At RS, for example, we need specialised suppliers for specific products and services,” she explains. “But even though we’re consolidating in one area, we’re diversifying in different ones so we are not too heavily reliant on a small group of suppliers.

    “Consolidation gives us simplification of what we do, but we need to think about resilience as well. To have a resilient supply chain, you can’t rely on too small a group, and that means increasing the number of vendors you’re working with, in a controlled way.”

    Breaking down supplier performance
    Organisations are also taking steps to better manage their supplier base. Half of the procurement professionals surveyed say between 50 and 100 per cent of their MRO spend is with a Tier 1 supplier, and 82 per cent of firms have contracts in place with this group of suppliers. Three-quarters (75%) of Tier 1 supplier contracts are actively managed.

    The use of key performance indicators (KPIs) is vital to effectively managing supplier performance, and the most common metrics used are on-time delivery (68%), quality (65%) and price (59%).

    But Liam Kettlewell, Commercial Director at RS, suggests there are other metrics that could also be included. “KPIs should provide an accurate pitch of the overall relationship so, for example, alongside measuring on-time delivery performance, you could also measure average supplier lead time,” he suggests.

    “That would allow organisations to assess both the accuracy of delivery commitments as well as the total length of time it took to provide the product. It may have taken three or four weeks but that might be two or three weeks longer than necessary.”

    Other possible metrics include average invoice value, which can help with identifying areas of spend that could be consolidated, and overall spend versus number of deliveries, which could highlight where deliveries could potentially be grouped together to reduce waste.

    Calculating the cost
    There are some alarm bells, though, when it comes to how procurement handles MRO procurement. Almost six in 10 (59%) admit they don’t know the cost of processing an order, which means they run the risk of not achieving the best price when all factors are included.

    “Understanding the cost of processing an order gives you a clear picture of where all the money is going, rather than just the price of the item,” points out Evans. “It’s not just about the cost but everything from sourcing to approvals and payments. If you don’t have that visibility and knowledge, it always will be harder for you to spot any inefficiencies or justify the need for investment in improving systems and processes.”

    Where businesses do know the cost, the average figure is £89. This rises to £95 for larger companies and £106 for medium-sized organisations, suggesting this is where there is greatest potential for improvement.

    Counterfeit products also pose a significant risk for anyone involved in the procurement of MRO equipment. Almost a quarter (23%) see this as a problem, although this has fallen from 42 per cent the year before.

    Kettlewell points out that the most effective way of ensuring only genuine items are used is by purchasing products through an authorised distributor which works closely with individual manufacturers and can offer guarantees and support to customers.

    “The level of counterfeits is improving and, with things like 3D printing and additive manufacturing, it’s becoming easier to create counterfeits,” he warns. “They can, quite easily, find a way into the supply chain.”

    To download the 2025 Indirect Procurement Report, click here.