“There are highly sophisticated suppliers selling counterfeit or unethical products (which may have used slave labour) that appear legitimate,” she adds. “So, it is always better to pay slightly more for a product from a trusted supplier and have the assurance that it meets all quality standards, than to take a risk with an unknown trader.”
Paying the price
If and when counterfeit goods do enter an organisation’s supply chain, the impact can be significant. MRO parts are crucial for keeping operations running but using counterfeits (however inadvertently) may lead to more downtime, which comes at a cost. According to the 2023 Maintenance Engineering Report produced by RS and the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE), the average hourly cost of plant downtime is more than £5,000.
There is also reputational risk. As Alder notes, fake products may have been made with slave labour or other unethical practices that contravene an organisation’s environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) policies at a time when both customers and investors are looking for robust credentials in these areas.
Mitigate against fakes
It’s crucial, therefore, that organisations have a way of conducting due diligence on suppliers, says Kate Davies, Global Head of Commercial Services at RS. This could be the responsibility of procurement itself, wider compliance colleagues or a trusted partner, but whoever is in the driving seat, “As a key criterion for decision-making, it’s vital procurement teams remain engaged and proactive,” adds Davies.